<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rite of passage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lavonardo.net/blog/2008/01/19/rite-of-passage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lavonardo.net/blog/2008/01/19/rite-of-passage/</link>
	<description>The life and times of a fallen hacker</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  7 Oct 2008 23:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lavonardo</title>
		<link>http://lavonardo.net/blog/2008/01/19/rite-of-passage/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>lavonardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavonardo.net/blog/2008/01/19/rite-of-passage/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I considered that alternative, but being lazy, I figured it's better to leave this to mr. webserver to handle rather than myself.  

Anyway, personal approval would eliminate false negatives from the equation, so if there's enough feedback about akismet unfairly devouring appropriate comments, I'll try that instead (or install some captcha implementation).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I considered that alternative, but being lazy, I figured it&#8217;s better to leave this to mr. webserver to handle rather than myself.  </p>
<p>Anyway, personal approval would eliminate false negatives from the equation, so if there&#8217;s enough feedback about akismet unfairly devouring appropriate comments, I&#8217;ll try that instead (or install some captcha implementation).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juha Ylitalo</title>
		<link>http://lavonardo.net/blog/2008/01/19/rite-of-passage/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Juha Ylitalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavonardo.net/blog/2008/01/19/rite-of-passage/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I've personally decided to handle spam issues with 'Comment author must have a previously approved comment' setting in Options -&#62; Discussion. 
Only problem is that I get loads of spam into my 'Vieraskirja' and '1st half of 2007' blog posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve personally decided to handle spam issues with &#8216;Comment author must have a previously approved comment&#8217; setting in Options -&gt; Discussion.<br />
Only problem is that I get loads of spam into my &#8216;Vieraskirja&#8217; and &#8216;1st half of 2007&#8242; blog posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
