<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam, spam, comments and spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lavonardo.net/blog/2008/04/21/spam-spam-comments-and-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lavonardo.net/blog/2008/04/21/spam-spam-comments-and-spam/</link>
	<description>The life and times of a fallen hacker</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  7 Oct 2008 19:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lavonardo</title>
		<link>http://lavonardo.net/blog/2008/04/21/spam-spam-comments-and-spam/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>lavonardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavonardo.net/blog/?p=475#comment-194</guid>
		<description>I figured that introducing Akismet is easier than hand-moderating the comments, and thus far the tool has been reliable - I've seen one false positive (had to rescue a valid comment manually) and false negatives usually end up in the check these-queue.  I think just a single spam entry made it through to the comments.  Then again, the comments are not that numerous that checking them would entail too much work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured that introducing Akismet is easier than hand-moderating the comments, and thus far the tool has been reliable - I&#8217;ve seen one false positive (had to rescue a valid comment manually) and false negatives usually end up in the check these-queue.  I think just a single spam entry made it through to the comments.  Then again, the comments are not that numerous that checking them would entail too much work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juha Ylitalo</title>
		<link>http://lavonardo.net/blog/2008/04/21/spam-spam-comments-and-spam/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Juha Ylitalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lavonardo.net/blog/?p=475#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Downside in using popular software like WordPress is that all spam robots will recognize your blog as WordPress blog and as a result, they know exactly what needs to be sent for comments. 
At least on my blog, spam seems to concentrate on couple static pages (guestbook to be more precise), so whenever I get comments for moderation into those pages, I never read e-mails about them. Instead I go through all those comments once a week or so and mark them as spam. All in all situation is good enough that I haven't bothered to activate Akismet (then again I moderate all comments from new readers in my blog).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Downside in using popular software like WordPress is that all spam robots will recognize your blog as WordPress blog and as a result, they know exactly what needs to be sent for comments.<br />
At least on my blog, spam seems to concentrate on couple static pages (guestbook to be more precise), so whenever I get comments for moderation into those pages, I never read e-mails about them. Instead I go through all those comments once a week or so and mark them as spam. All in all situation is good enough that I haven&#8217;t bothered to activate Akismet (then again I moderate all comments from new readers in my blog).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
